2026 ALL GHANA BADMINTON CHAMPIONSHIPS (POST-EVENT STAKEHOLDER SURVERY)

2026 ALL GHANA BADMINTON CHAMPIONSHIPS (POST-EVENT STAKEHOLDER SURVERY)

We appreciate your contribution to the 2026 All Ghana Badminton Championships. Your feedback directly informs the evolution of our events—starting with the National Doubles Championships (3–4 July 2026).
Survey Details:
Closing Date: 7th April 2026
Average Completion Time: 15 minutes
Kindly complete all sections relevant to your role. Thank you for helping us elevate the standard of Ghana Badminton.

press Enter

SECTION A: DEMOGRAPHICS

1. What is your primary role in the championships?
2. Which category best describes your participation?
3. How many times have you participated in the All Ghana Badminton Championships?

SECTION B: REGISTRATION PORTAL & PRE-EVENT EXPERIENCE

4. How did you find the registration process?
5. Was the registration portal accessible on all devices (mobile, tablet, desktop)?
6. How clear were the instructions provided during registration?
7. Did you experience any technical issues while registering?
8. Were payment options (if applicable) clearly stated and convenient?
9. How responsive was the support team for registration inquires?
10. Were confirmation details (schedule, draws, venue info sent in a timely manner?

SECTION C: VENUE & INFRASTRUCTURE

11. How would you rate the overall venue condition?
12. Was the playing surface (courts) up to competitive standard?
13. How adequate was the lighting for matches?
14. How would you rate the aesthetic design and “look and feel” of the Field of Play (branding, court mats and overall beauty)?
15. How would you rate the seating capacity and spectator comfort?
16. Were changing rooms and washroom facilities clean and accessible?
17. How effectively did the event branding (banners, backdrops, and flags) create a “Championship Atmosphere”?
18. How clear was the signage (directions, court numbers, registration desk)?
19. How would you rate the overall “Media Appeal” of the setup (how well the court and branding looked for photos and videos)?
20. How would you rate the overall cleanliness and maintenance of the venue?
21. Was the venue well-ventilated/cooled?

SECTION D: TECHNICAL OFFICIALS (Umpires, Referees, Line Judges)

22. How well were technical officials briefed before the event
23. Were the number of officials sufficient for the number of matches?
24. How would you rate the consistency of officiating across matches?
25. How effectively did the officiating team manage the “Field of Play” protocol (e.g., player entries, intervals, and shuttle control)?
26. How efficient was the referee desk in handling appeals/disputes?
27. Was there a clear rotation system for officials to avoid fatigue
28. How would you rate the professionalism of technical officials
29. Were officials provided with adequate refreshments?
30. Were officials provided with adequate breaks?
31. Would you recommend the same officiating team for future events

SECTION E: PLAYERS-COMPETITION EXPERIENCE

32. How satisfied were you with the match scheduling?
33. Were there adequate warm-up for you before matches?
34. Did you ever look at the prospectus in details?
35. How clear were the rules and format communicated in the prospectus?
37. Were medical/first aid services readily available?
38. How would you rate the quality of shuttles used?
39. Was there a fair separation between U19 and Senior categories?
40. How satisfied were you with the prize money structure?
41. Were prize money payments processed on time?
42. Did you feel the competition was well-organized overall?
43. Would you invite more people to participate in the next event (3-4 Jul, 2026)?

SECTION F: COACHES & TEAM STAFF

44. How accessible were event organizers for team-related inquiries?
45. Was there a designated area for coaches during matches?
46. Were coaching passes and accreditation handled smoothly?
47. How well were match schedules communicated to teams?
48. Did you have access to match statistics or results in real time on the ghanabadminton.org website?
49. Were there adequate hydration stations for players

SECTION G: EVENT STAFF & ORGANIZAITON

50. How would you rate the coordination among event staff?
51. Were staff identifiable (uniforms, badges)?
52. How responsive was the event control desk to issues?
53. Was the event schedule adhered to?
54. How would you rate the overall communication during the event?

SECTION H: LED ENTERTAINMENT, MUSIC & ATMOSPHERE

55. How would you rate the quality of LED screens/displays
56. Was the content displayed (scores, replays, player intros) engaging?
57. How would you rate the music selection and timing?
58. Did the entertainment enhance the overall event experience?
59. Were there enough activities/engagement for spectators between matches?

SECTION I: MEDIA & PHOTOGRAPHY

60. How would you rate media accreditation and access?
61. Was there a designated media/photography area with clear sightlines?
62. Were match results and information promptly shared with media?
63. How would you rate the quality of official event photography?
64. Was there adequate media coverage (pre-event, live, post-event)?
65. Were media releases and updates timely ad accurate?

SECTION K: PRIZE MONEY & AWARDS

66. How satisfied were you with the prize money categories?
67. Were award ceremonies well-organized?
68.Were winners announced promptly after finals?
69. Were trophies/medals of good quality?

SECTION L: EVENT CATEGORIES (U19 & SENIORS)

70. Was the performance gap between U19 and Senior levels appropriately managed?
71. Did U19 players have adequate exposure and competitive matches?
72. Were there enough entries in each category?

SECTION M: FOOD, HYDRATION & AMENTIES

73. Were food and beverage options available at the venue?
74. How would you rate the quality of food offered?
75. Were water stations easily accessible?

SECTION N: SAFETY & SECURITY

76. How would you rate the security presence at the venue?
77. Did you feel safe throughout the event?
78. Was there a clear emergency procedure in place?

SECTION O: OVERALL SATISFACTION & FEEDBACK

79. What was the best aspect of the event?
80. What areas need the most improvement?
Use Shift+Tab to go back